What was in the Editorial section in Washington Examiner?
Enough is Enough at Gallaudet (I copied and pasted below from that link)
WASHINGTON – It doesn’t matter whether Gallaudet University students had reasonable grounds for being unhappy at the choice of Jane Fernandes as incoming president of the well-known school for the deaf in Northeast D.C. By going so far as to shut down the campus for three days, the protesters made themselves into nothing better than hooligans. As such, they deserve neither sympathy nor respect.
With even the elementary and high school students denied access to their own classrooms on campus, university officials had no choice but to ask the police to start making arrests.
Of course, every American enjoys the right to peaceful assembly, to protest and to unhindered political speech. But nobody has the right to deprive other people of their liberty or their property (including intellectual property or the pursuit thereof) without due process of law. The other Gallaudet students who weren’t involved in the protest over Fernandes paid for their education — to the tune of $11,359 per semester. To deprive them of that education by forcibly blocking their entrance to campus was robbing them just assuredly as if the protesters had taken their wallets. It was a criminal act — and university officials finally treated it as such.
Even worse was the bad example set for the deaf children in elementary school who share the same campus. These young students did not have access to other venues where they could get education tailored to their special needs. The example of lawlessness that the older protesting college students set could do lasting damage, giving the younger students the idea that free speech is not a respectful exchange of ideas, but instead a matter of brute force.
And despite the fact that there was no physical violence by the Gallaudet protesters, their blockade nevertheless used force to make a point. What would have happened if somebody tried to cross the blockade in order to exercise their own legal right to the education they paid for?
Back during the campus unrest of the 1960s and early ’70s, anti-war activists made the same mistake, thinking their cause more important than other people’s rights. Ronald Reagan, then governor of California, knew what to do with those protesters: He had them arrested. His tough stance did not make him a pariah but a hero in his state. He was re-elected to a second term by a huge margin of 600,000 votes, and went on to become president. Gallaudet President I. King Jordan demonstrated similar courage by ordering the arrests and reopening the campus on Saturday. Jordan is not a “traitor,” as some of the students who once supported him are now calling him. By standing up to the mob, he demonstrated precisely those qualities of character and leadership that earned students’ initial respect. His will be very big shoes to fill.
The lesson here is that protesters who take things too far often do their own cause more harm than good. The American people are more than willing to listen to reasoned — and sometimes even strident —arguments. But they have no patience with self-absorbed law-breakers.Gallaudet’s campus should never have been closed in the first place.But it was necessary to reopen it by the force of law — which is the only legitimate force there is.
What do I think of this?
Well, I think it is wrong to block Gallaudet entrances… why ? Students have classes. Teachers have to teach for those students who come to the class. You realize how much it costs to have an education? 11,359 dollars a semester! That is alot of money. The entrances should be permanently open.
Well, I am not there. And I dont know if any students, faculty, and staff are still going on with their daily lives either working or going to classes or join the protests completely, but I am sure some of them still want to continue their education and not part of the protest. I think there are about 1,100 students. I doubt that all are joining the protest.
It is not like that I am against what is going on with Gallaudet. I support you 100 percent! I support the non-violence protest. I support a peace assembly! I have no problem with that. I say you keep up with it, until you get what you want. I think Jane should be resigning. I think we need a new BoT … But why choose to block the whole Gallaudet’s entrances? I think they can do better than that. They have not done nothing wrong — I mean students, faculty, and staff who want to enter Gallaudet — while you block them, they are stuck. Let them have the access to Gallaudet completely. Well, I am glad that it is not blocking any more. But please don’t do that again
I realize that it said MSSD elementary students are not going to classes because of the blockage. That is pretty serious. I think they should be in the classes, not out of class. I thought the leaders should have allowed them enter to their school. The education is very important. I understand that the protest is very important, too, but blocking them is not helping. It makes us look bad.
FYI, I have written a longest entry in my blog history, the title will be: What do I think of Jane Fernandes? It will be published shortly after I proofread … so far it is my third time proofreading.
Correction: I was informed that MSSD and KDES (high school and elementary schools) were allowed to open for students to come to school. Protestors did not close that entrance. But IKJ forced to close it. I was also told that IKJ told the PR to lie to the media… If that is true, it is a very bad image for IKJ and PR!
However, my opinion about closing the entrances still stands. It is very wrong, either by protestors or by IKJ.
Blogged with Flock













I have seen Britney on the most recent People magazine. She was in Washington Post Express, as well. She looks great as always!

She said she must had called him 500 times to get ahold of him… but Adradhana’s supervisor took her to him while he crouched his knee down to the floor, with roses, the ring, and the copy of the paper, in case if she missed it.



J 6:11 pm on October 16, 2006 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Wow. Let me just say first that I’m a Californian; people definitely don’t consider him a ‘pariah’. Comparing him to IKJ, and calling it ‘courage’ to sit behind a desk and order arrests of peaceful protesters is stupid and remiss.
Secondly, because there were reports of fire that night on campus (uh, hello, it’s a college campus, pretty normal) the firemarshall was the one who ‘made the call’ – telling IKJ to arrest people or she’d get fined. IKJ, not wanting to pay money and finally having legal president to do so, started having people arrested.
And last – I had the chicken pocks in 1st grade and missed 2 whole weeks of school. And surprise surprise, I turned out alright; I didn’t get pissed off and demand 2 weeks of tuition back. I didn’t fail out of school.
That’s it.
mary jane IV 6:11 pm on October 16, 2006 Permalink | Log in to Reply
With any doubt this article protrays how self centered these studetns are bllocking education for other students as well as MSSD and Kendall. Do they relized how much money is wasted. Im sad to see how they decide dsitort stories to the media that IKJ was responsible for closing the gates at MSSD and Kendall. I agree it shows a VERY bad image of Gallaudet.
I m not taking sides, I dont like fernandez and I dont like whaet the protesters are doing to get their point accross.
Henry Vlug 6:23 pm on October 16, 2006 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Short term pain for long term gain. Any of you ever seen that phrase and understand the concept?
Yeah there was some inconvenience – short term pain – for those who wanted to go on with life as normal. But if JKF is removed and replaced that will be long term gain!
mary jane IV 6:33 pm on October 16, 2006 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Long time gam. What if Gallaudet ends up w a president like the one at harvard and AMerican. I dont think JKF will do that type of stuff
Dean 6:38 pm on October 16, 2006 Permalink | Log in to Reply
Mary Jane, You said JKF will do that type of stuff? Can you tell me what you mean ? I have not heard of a president like the one at Harvard and American. Care to tell me?